Categories
Reviews

Bug the bug

Bug (2007 movie) posterMy rating of Bug (2006): A (Outstanding)
Cast: Ashley Judd, Michael Shannon, Lynn Collins, Harry Connick Jr
Directed by: William Friedkin
Studio: Lionsgate Films

Two years ago I had done a sponsored post for the pre-release publicity of the movie Bug. I finally got to watch this movie on Star Movies a few days ago. Lionsgate Films is one of my favourite studios for it releases quirky but noteworthy movies which other studios give a pass; their movies do end up winning Oscars too.

Bug is simply mind-blowing. I knew I should expect something great when the director is the same guy who directed The Exorcist [my rating – A- (almost perfect)] and William Friedkin doesn’t disappoint. At this point, I must stop and say “caveat emptor” – for most people will simply hate this movie. The Yahoo! Movies detail page for Bug shows the startling divide in opinion; with critics giving it an overall of B (good), and general users giving it a D (dreadful). Such disparity is rare. In most cases, critics will give something in the range of C and users will give in the range of B. This is a movie which truly polarises the audience towards extremes. The same story is repeated on Rotten Tomatoes. Bug is very much arthouse-cinema-ish.

What seems to have happened is that William Friedkin came up with a masterpiece which Lionsgate was sure would never be a box office success. (I agree with that assessment too.) Lionsgate execs then seem to have decided to market this as some sort of campy horror flick – the kind which has Jennifer Love-Hewitt running around screaming in tight shorts. At least, that’s what the movie poster / trailer seems to imply.

[yahoo 2519562]

Watch the un-truest summing up Bug‘s storyline in its official trailer

Perish the thought of the prospect of watching a flick where you can switch off your brain and watch rivers of blood flowing (despite what the trailer tells you), although this definitely is a movie so slow-paced that you’ll keep looking at your watch every few minutes. If you went in without this prior knowledge, you’ll keep expecting the cheesy music to start any moment. It never does.

But that is precisely what sets this so-called ‘thriller’ apart. There is much character development. The story is set within a short timeline, but within that you really get drawn into the character’s perspective of the world around them. The whole movie mostly revolves around Ashley Judd and Michael Shannon’s performance in a single motel room (I know there are perverts in the audience who’ll interpret this in the ‘wrong’ way); without the crutch of exotic locations the movie truly has to depend on the acting prowess of its cast. And the cast doesn’t disappoint.

Bug documents the descent of a guy and his (new) fiancĂ© down the road of madness, eventually leading to ritual suicide…or are they really mad? Are the ‘bugs’ (which are never actually visible on-screen as the characters describe them as ‘small aphids) real or the figment of a delusional paranoid? Is the ‘government agency doctor’ a psychiatrist who’s trying to a get an escaped patient back to hospital…or is he associated with military secret service, doing research in biological weapons?

The movie, for most part, is quite idyllic. Trust me, unless someone recommended this to you, you would probably not stick around till the end. It’s the final act in the last 30 minutes of the movie which makes you admit “Yes, this movie is great; yes, all that character development was worthwhile”. The feel of the finale is quite like that of some macabre opera piece. Michael Shannon gives a really intense and impressive performance. Ashley Judd acts as the perfect foil to the ‘delusional’ Shannon towards the beginning of the movie, but by the end of the movie she is so madly in love that she’s ready to, say, set herself on fire (which she does).

A better title for the movie would probably be Snail, to signify the pace of the movie. Seems as if the screenplay was written for a play and not a movie. Well, technically, this movie is adapted from a Broadway / West End play after all. In case you’re looking for a unique movie experience, I will definitely recommend this movie. If, however, you prefer mainstream movies then give this a miss.

A quick word about another Lionsgate movie I watched recently – Captivity starring Elisha Cuthbert (she’s the only ‘well-known’ actor in the movie), directed by Roland Joffe. I’d give it a B. Critics panned this one, but isn’t half as bad. Not really anything new; still, if you liked the Saw / Hostel series of movies you’ll probably like this one too.

PS – This blog post’s title is dedicated to the memory of a now-extinct blog.

Originally posted at Youthpad.

Categories
Reviews

Half Bloody Boring, Half Bloody Brilliant

Originally posted at Youthpad.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince movie poster 2My rating of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: A- (Almost perfect)
Cast: Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Tom Felton, Michael Gambon, Alan Rickman
Directed by: David Yates
Studio: Warner Bros

After being delayed for one whole year by fat cats in the top echelons of Warner Bros who wanted to rake in more money with a big summer blockbuster. What, in your opinion, is the best way to thank fans for the wait?

  1. Free popcorn and drinks, sponsored by Warner Bros.
  2. Money back guarantee.
  3. Spend own money to upgrade ALL theatres to IMAX so that audience can have a better viewing experience.
  4. Promote the movie with the gayest movie poster ever.

If you chose option 4, then congratulations! You’re on your way to becoming a much despised movie studio executive. Just because JK Rowling revealed Dumbledore was gay doesn’t mean you have to use that, you know.

I used to think public *nudge nudge wink wink* displays of paedophilia was banned around the globe. Apparently, I was wrong.
I used to think public *nudge nudge wink wink* displays of paedophilia was banned around the globe. Apparently, I was wrong.

David Yates who directed Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (my review here) is back at the helm. Story-wise the fifth movie was the weakest in the franchise so far; watching Order of the Phoenix felt like watching cricket match highlights. Technical aspects were great – the cinematography especially was brilliant. Yates continues with same tradition with superb cinematography in the sixth movie, although not quite the same use of flybys all the time. Special effects are good too.

Half-Blood Prince truly shines through with its story / screenplay. Distilling down hundreds of pages of a book and bringing it alive on-screen is admittedly an uphill task. This movie is able to strike a fine balance between what should’ve been left and out and what shouldn’t. It is very true to the essence of the book even if at had to throw out some sub-plots / scenes. I would go as far to say that Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy – which is the pinnacle of faithful book-to-movie adaptations so far – Half-Blood Prince sets an example for what filmmakers should try to achieve when making adaptations. Steve Kloves (screenplay) and David Yates deserve a round of applause.

Once again, Darrell Alexander Nicholas Hooper disappoints with the musical score. Ever since he took over this part in the last movie, he has messed up the score. That guy has absolutely no frikkin’ idea what kind of music goes with what scene. He’ll happily plod down Super Mario-ish soundtrack for an intense battle-scene.

Daniel Radcliffe has finally taken some acting lessons. He’s still quite terrible, but less so compared to earlier editions. Harry becomes Neo in this movie as he is the ‘Chosen One’. Rupert Grint doesn’t get much to play in this movie – whatever time he does get is spent snogging. As usual Alan Rickman and Emma Watson (whose new hobby seems to be beating up people with books / papers) deliver the best performances out of all the cast members with realistic acting, with the surprise addition of Tom Felton to the list too this time. He’s been one of the better actors in the series and does a good job this time. I wonder how good the next movie installment (it is to be released in two parts) would be without Alan Rickman. Michael Gambon fulfills his role of a paedophile by taking keen interest in Potter’s love life. Just like the kiss with Cho Chang in the last movie, the scene in this one with Ginny Weasley and Potter seems very wooden and forced.

[yahoo 13010741]

Watch the trailer for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

One thing that this movie sorely lacks is pace. While the adaptation is faithful to the essence of the book it is equally slowed paced as the LOTR movies. David Yates seems to have been inspired by LOTR in his direction style. Nobody will deny the movie is good, but at 2.5 hours run-time the movie drags its feet along in some scenes. Nevertheless, a good movie, a notch up from the old one; still not good enough to dethrone Alfonso Cuaron’s Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban as the best in the series so far.

PS – You know that this Harry Potter craze is going too far when tutorials on how muggles can play Quidditch start being made.

PPS – Don’t miss this video – Hitler reacts to the delay in launch of the Half-Blood Prince movie.