Categories
Reviews Technology

Adieu, Nokia 3220…

My (final) rating of Nokia 3220: 7.7 / 10

Nokia 3220
It comes to an end finally. After almost two years of having the Nokia 3220 as my faithful cellphone companion, which I thought I just couldn’t give up because I liked it so much, finally had to go. Sigh. What a sad loss.

It all happened like this. My phone got ‘sweat-logged’ while I was using it when playing. Serious. I’m NOT kidding – about the sweat-logging, and more importantly, the playing part. It seems that some sweat had leaked through the keypad’s d-pad area and into the internal circuitry. When I opened the cover, I could even see streams of water swirling around under the keypad. Result – when I pressed a particular key, something totally different got registered as a keypress with the phone! It’s very disconcerting to type ‘r’ and get an ‘a’. Anyway, things were pretty bad I guess, so with chants of ‘Long live PPP’ I tread the path to a mobile store (rather, The Mobile Store). I got an LG KG 300, a review on that coming up after I use it for some time.

Coming back to my old phone. It was simply AMAZING. It was a phone far ahead of its time when it was launched. It was among the first ones to support EDGE (Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution) / HCSD (High Speed Circuit Switched Data), and a good xHTML parser too. It wasn’t a buggy Series 60 phone which takes 30 seconds JUST to start, and for a phone which didn’t use a highly complex OS (it was a Series 40 phone), it handled Java apps and parsed web pages blazingly fast. Even among phones with VGA cameras, it gave pretty good performance for its price-range, without being slow. Oh, and it was a phone, right? Just in case you ever forgot that bit, the voice clarity would remind you that bit.

What I liked the best was its ergonomics. With rubber side grips and a radical new contour which fitted your palm beautifully, it ensured a great level of comfort. It also featured a bump-surface rubber keypad. The advantage of this is that unlike a staggering majority of phones out today which have flat keypads with only a small marker on the number 5 for touch typing, the Nokia 3220 has a well-defined bump for each key. You could close your eyes and feel your way around the keypad to compose a message easily, which is what I did a lot when people sent me SMSes which I needed to reply to at the crack of dawn (10-11am IST). With a rubber, instead of plastic keypad, it ensured that keypresses were smoother, and yet maintained a pleasant tactile feedback.

The phone is not only rugged in looks with its rubber grips, but rugged in design too. When I had done my original research, I’d read on CNET that ‘…the phone is rugged, and survived our drop tests well…’. Indeed it does, and I speak from personal experience. Clumsy that I am, I’ve dropped the phone from various heights, and sometimes just for fun, so MANY times (a few times a month, on an average) and it never got affected! It’s is constructed in such a way that the structure takes the impact by releasing the cover and letting the battery fall out, rather than ramming it in and having it take on the full impulse. All you have to do is to put the battery back in, and you’re back in business.

The thing which I was TOTALLY crazy about though were the synchronized lights, and wave texting. The 3220 had synchronized lights at its sides, which at least to me, looked uber-cool and funky. It was not only for looks, it had useful function too in glowing in different colors to notify about new messages / missed calls. Many people didn’t like this though, and complained to Nokia. The point is, even though people could turn it off if they wanted, most didn’t care to go through the settings. Finally, later models of Nokia 3220 had the lights disconnected from the phone circuit, remaining as vestigial parts in the translucent rubber grip. The other apparently which people didn’t like is the funky color scheme that the phone came in, while for me it was a major attraction. Later models were turned out in a tasteless gray color.

And then there was wave texting, the coolest feature of the phone. This required a separate attachment, which is basically a row of LED lights on the back cover. It, literally, allowed you to form messages in mid-air. Although the number of characters you could use were limited, it was a very sexy feature. You just enter a message, or choose from among the predefined ones, and shake the phone in a gentle left-right motion in the air. A motion sensor detects this, and fires the LEDs in such a sequence that the message seems to hang in mid-air. The attachment also allowed you to play games using inputs from the motion sensor (much before Wii came along) – you could just shake the mobile in a particular direction to make a character move, but this was only for games built exclusively for 3220. And yet, people didn’t like this feature.

Amazing though this phone was, Nokia throttled it because of poor thinking. This phone was targeted towards the young generation, which is known to be very demanding of its gadgets. Nokia didn’t think about that, and didn’t give the phone Bluetooth or IR support. It had an internal memory of about 4 MB, and no support for SD cards. After making an amazing phone which had the potential to take the youth by storm, it left it stranded with poor tech support in other areas. It didn’t even market it well – they launched the marketing campaign for it under the tagline It’s a new phone everyday, referring to the transparent back cover which allowed you to put plastic cutouts of various designs (the phone even came with a stencil so that you could make your own – just put it over a printed sheet of paper which has a design, trace, cut it out, and just put it in). Now I’m not saying they shouldn’t have done this, in fact, I liked this too – I loved making new cutouts to match my wallpapers; and sometimes leaving it blank so that people could see the internal circuitry of the phone and see their jaw drop. But then, it’s other features like wave texting, motion sensitive input et al were relegated to the background. It’s almost as if they were embarrassed about it.


Watch the It’s a new phone everyday ad for the Nokia 3220

It feels so sad, that Nokia killed this phone, just like it did for the N-Gage. Both were promising platforms, albeit N-Gage less so – I mean, who wants to dial holding the phone one way, and then turn it around to speak? What I feel is that Nokia could very well have converted the 3220 into a series of its own, or at least churned out an updated version which had more features. It also shows the importance of marketing. It didn’t give the 3220 all must-have features, which put it out of running among kids. And then, it foolishly tried to pitch it to adults who hated the garish colors and funky designs. All this resulted in a radical phone getting pushed out of public mindspace – nobody I know recalled the model when I told them about it. Search for it on the Net, and you mostly find the odd article from tech mags talking about its new wave texting technology. That’s it.

It is sad that I had to finally give this cute little phone up. Sometimes, I just used to let an incoming call ring, to gaze at the synchronized lights (much to the consternation of the person who would be calling me). I really really really loved that feature. Sigh, they don’t make it anymore. And neither is any other manufacturer being bold. I was really really attached to the phone, despite it getting pretty outdated. Goodbye, my 3220, may you find loads of relaxing diodes and soothing MIDIs in semiconductor heaven.

Categories
Technology

A Little Less Conversation On Freespire

Must be wondering what I’m up to these days, right? After all, I haven’t been posting a lot recently, unlike the past 2-3 months which saw an overflow of posts. I was just busy transitioning all my documents to the latest OpenDocument formats.

Over the years, I’ve accumulated hundreds of documents in Microsoft’s formats, and StarOffice formats which the older OpenOffice.org 1.0 (OOo) used. Since I’ve been using OOo for a long times, I’d got loads of .sxw’s and others. I finally decided that it’s highly improbable that I’m gonna come across OOo 1.x anywhere, so I decided to switch to the latest. Now OOo 2.x ships with a document converter for this, which made my task pretty easy, but then I had to move in and delete the old files, and check for multiple copies on my system, delete the redundant ones – you get my point don’t you?

And why this, all of a sudden? Well, I’ve been pretty fluid till now as far as my operating system is concerned, playing with new ones all the time. That was until last year, when I switched to Freespire 1.0, and fell in love with it, and it’s ideology. Just a month down the line, Freespire 2.0 is going to be released, and I’m getting back a bit of order on my HDD.

Freespire is a free version of Linspire, one of the ‘easiest’ Linux distros around. What sets it apart from others is that it ships with proprietary codecs and drivers, making it far more compatible and hassle-free than other Linux distros. But for me, it’s not only about that – after all, it takes hardly any effort to get those anyway in other distros too. The reason why I like Freespire is its ideology – this is first Linux distro which targeted itself at the mainstream market, and was good at it (unlike other pathetic ones I’ve used, like Xandros).

At the end of the day, I feel that Linux supporters acting all snooty and trying to create a fence between mainstream users and Linux don’t do any good for our cause. Ogg Vorbis (even though it may be good) is NOT going to replace MP3 as the de facto music media standard anytime in the near future, period; so let’s accept that and move on. It makes no sense to confuzzle a non-geek by throwing up talk of codecs and all – all he would care for is that his CD plays when it’s popped into the tray. That’s why I like Freespire – it may embrace proprietary, but it’ll only make Linux more popular.

Why not use Ubuntu then, as people like Prashanth keep on saying. After all, even it can download codecs. For them I say, it’s not about how easy it is download codecs – I’ve worked long enough to know how to do it from the terminal. It’s about the target market, and ideology. Ubuntu is being built by South African billionaire Mark Shuttleworth, for helping spread computing in developing countries in Africa – THAT is its first objective. Naturally, on the top of the list right now is to get the basics right – editing documents, web browsing etc.

Freespire, on the other hand, doesn’t target that segment. It grows up from Linspire, a Linux distro that was made with the mainstream and commercial segment in mind. Freespire has grown beyond the basics from the very beginning – instead it concentrates segments which want their graphics cards to work, DVDs to play, media collections to be ready to listen to, wireless cards to be detected – all out of the box. Freespire’s main focus has been on getting software install for Linux to be easy, via its Click N’ Run (CNR) feature. Yes, software can easily be installed via Ubuntu’s Synaptic too, but CNR offers download, documentation, and user reviews, all at the same place.

I believe in Freespire’s philosophy a lot. When Dell decided to ship laptops with Linux on popular demand, they contacted Michael Robertson, the founder of Linspire, whether he was ready to have his OS to be chosen for this purpose. And you know what? With thousands of orders right at hand, he refused! He said that the current demand for Linux is from enthusiasts, and thus Dell should use something like Fedora, Ubuntu or openSUSE. Further, he said that Linspire and its likes are targeted at the mainstream market, and Linux is NOT ready for that, it needs at least two more years. He felt that by falsely saying Linux is too easy, and shipping Freespire, he’d only be hurting Linux’s image in the long run. Now THAT is what takes real guts to do – foregoing a commercial order, all for the future of Linux!

Furthermore, he felt that one major impediment to Linux’s popularity was software install – which, until recently, took loads of work. To ensure that this doesn’t remain a drawback, Linspire’s decided to open up its CNR service to other major distros like Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian and openSUSE too, apart from its own Linspire and Freespire.

THAT is the reason why I like Freespire, and its been a record that I didn’t change my distro for a interminably long time (almost one year). Because Linux is not about loading a distro, working with it for 30 minutes, taking a few screenshots, writing a ‘review’ and then going back to Windows for me. It’s not only about the OS – it’s the ideology behind it that counts too.

That’s why I haven’t installed Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn (well ahem…the actual reason is that I haven’t received my Ubuntu CD via ShipIt, but…).

That’s why, I’m waiting for the June release of Freespire 2.0