Categories
Reviews Technology

Motorola Motoflip W220 Review: A Fresh Look Phone

Product talk on Motorola W220 on Engadget Mobile
My Rating of Motoflip W220: 7.9 / 10
Pros: Clamshell design with a reasonably sleek profile and weight; innovative outer ‘display’; FM radio. Good budget buy.
Cons: No camera / Bluetooth; snap-shut system feels badly made; bad keypad for touch-keypadding; small memory with no expansion slot.

To be fair to the phone, excuse me if I misjudged it. I only handled it for a short period of time when my pal Prashanth came over. Nevertheless, it was more time than what people generally spend at a phone store evaluating phones. I’d asked him to review it on his blog, since he didn’t here’s some blah on it on my blahg.

Motoflip W220 is in the revolutionary new batch of phones that Motorola is launching in the lower segment – like some absolutely dirt cheap lower end models which have a nice finish, and yet pack in exceptionally bright B&W displays. W220 is one of the lowest clamshell phones in the market, and yet, it looks good and has a nice feature set. It seems that this phone has been launched specifically for the Asia Pacific market for now, so you probably won’t find this in other areas.

The phone has a slim profile, and a reasonably bright screen. No navigation problems on this, the buttons are adequately spaced too. It comes with the usual FM radio that’s appearing on many phones these days, but lacks a camera. Of course, if you want that, you can pay a bit more to get the Motoflip W280, which has one.

What made me give it a higher rating than the Nokia 6260 (read my earlier review) is it’s highly innovative outer display. Now higher end clamshells usually have a lower resolution display on the outer cover to show limited info. With a budget model, two functioning screens were out of question. What Motorola did was amazing – and showed that if they work at it they can make good phones. They made a small display on the outside which uses icon-based notfication – when you get a call / SMS etc, an icon for it blinks outside. And they looked cool too!

What I didn’t like was the snap-shut system, because it didn’t do what it was supposed to do – snap-shut easily. Higher end phones in the clamshell category are pretty good in this aspect, they can open and close in flick. Strangely, this one doesn’t work as well as in others because you practically have to lift it open or close it shut. A very irritating thing.

Once again, Motorola’s iTap predictive text messaging irritated me, and messaging is something I do a lot. The keypad too leaves much to be desired – although it’s a copy in plastic of the metal-etched version found on RAZR / SLVR / RIZR, it just doesn’t have the same feel. I’ve used the SLVR too, and touch-keypadding is possible on it. The one on W220 though just doesn’t make the cut, because it practically has NO texture. And the plastic rip-off is a cheap-looking blemish on an otherwise good phone. A different, separate buttons keypad would have made it look better.

Overall, a good budget buy, the phone looks good too. However, for marginally more, or even at the same price competitors offer phones with more features, albeit with more standard looks. It all boils down to what you want more – style, or functionality.

PS – Your comments would be welcome on this one Prashanth!

Categories
Reviews Technology

Nokia 6260 Review: A Bad Buy

Nokia 6260Product description for Nokia 6260 on Yahoo! Tech
My Rating of Nokia 6260: 6 / 10
Pros: The usual stuff is all there – VGA camera, Bluetooth / IR, FM radio, MP3 capability, memory card slot etc – but which phone doesn’t have that in the medium range segment.
Cons: Pathetic design – it’s simply TERRIBLE. Amazingly small buttons which hinder your work.

Yes folks, what you saw is correct. I AM giving a low rating to a Nokia phone. Before you faint, let me elaborate.

The Nokia 6260 is clamshell-design phone – something Nokia hasn’t been very good at. Nokia better stick to its candybar shape, if this is all they can come up with. The first thing that puts you off is the bulk – it’s monstrously heavy even compared to the cheaper Moto W220 (read my next review)! It’s too thick to compete with other models these days. Then come the buttons, the next thing you need to interface with – they’re too bloody small. I think I’m pretty nimble with cellphone keypads, but sheesh, the buttons on the 6260 are so small that multiple time I ended up someplace else on the interface because something else got pressed by mistake. You’ll find navigation especially difficult around the d-pad (direction pad) and the softkey buttons. Also, for a medium end phone, it’s got a horrible screen resolution. My ol’ faithful Nokia 3220 (yes, I still have that – I just can’t give it up because of its side lights!) feels better than it, because I was squinting on the 6260. It’s not because of the native screen resolution I guess – the fact is that too much screen real estate is devoted to unnecessary things.

Navigating the menu is a pain, what with the small d-pad, but if you switch from grid view to list view, you’ll find the list too long to your liking. Using shortcuts is easier, but then, how many do?

The worst for the last. I told you that it has a camera, along with the usual 4 different shooting modes. Interestingly, it also gives you the self-timer mode candybar Nokias come with. It’s easy to make candybar phones stand, but please do explain to me how exactly can you make a top-heavy clamshell phone orient itself for a shoot. Now get this – the camera is placed not at the back, but at the SIDE of the camera. Although it does have a swivel screen, it IS awkward. Camera phones are SUPPOSED to be for spur of the moment candid shots, because for anything else, a person uses a digicam. Why add extra steps to the process beats me.

Overall, not a good phone to buy, not unless you want to struggle around trying to press the right button on an extremely small keypad.